Team-Driven Microservice Quality Assurance

30-minute Talk

Quality assurance of a 200+ microservices system can not be centralized but needs to happen within the team, utilizing its expertise and creativity

Timetable

11:55 a.m. – 12:25 p.m. Wednesday 6th

Room

Room F3 - Track 3: Talks

Audience

Tester, Developer, Product Owner

Key-Learnings

  • QA measures working for microservices
  • classical QA measures not working for microservices

While the Microservice architectural style has a lot of benefits, it makes certain QA practices impractical: there is no big release candidate that can be tested before put to production, no single log file to look into for root cause analysis and no single team to assign found bugs to. Instead there are deployments happening during test runs, as many log files as there are microservices and many teams to mess with the product.

At REWE digital we took a strictly team-driven QA approach. Our teams tried a lot of good and bad ideas to QA our microservice ecosystem. This involves automated testing, but also monitoring, logging and alerting practices.

In this talk I will present some of the best and worst of those ideas and explain how we try to implement a minimal QA alignment.

- – - – - – - – - – - –

Get access to the slides here:

https://slides.com/mkutz/team-driven-microservicequality-assurance

Related Sessions

Tue, Nov 05 • 11:55 a.m. – 12:25 p.m.
Room F1 - Track 1: Talks

30-min New Voice Talk

Wed, Nov 06 • 4:55 p.m. – 5:25 p.m.
Room F2 - Track 2: Talks

30-minute Talk

Tue, Nov 05 • 4:55 p.m. – 5:25 p.m.
Room F3 - Track 3: Talks

30-minute Talk

Tue, Nov 05 • 2:25 p.m. – 5:25 p.m.
Creative Space Room - Track 9: Bonus Sessions

150-min Workshop